Cotswold Archaeological Trust — Forensic Assessment

Chronology and catalogue links — assessed 10-10-2026: See the Institutional Involvement Roadmap (1877–2026) for the date-ordered institution, people and evidence sequence. The reported 1988 Cadw-to-Minister spot-listing letter has its own placeholder at GHF-E152; the original has not been attached to that page as at 10-10-2026. A placeholder records an evidence gap, not the letter’s content or proof of misconduct.

Forensic Assessment — Cotswold Archaeological Trust

Scope: the archaeological contractor’s own work, instructions and records. No conclusion is drawn from GGAT’s role merely because the bodies interacted.

Role

The archaeological record places Cotswold in the later intervention programme. The forensic question is what work it was actually commissioned to perform, under what planning/condition mandate, what it reported, and how its records were preserved.

Control test

Reconstruct the commissioning authority, scope, condition numbers, briefing, fieldwork, finds/osteology transfer, report chain and subsequent archive deposit. The 1994 mandate/condition 17 issues identified in the wider forensic material must be tested against the original documents.

Current finding

As at 10-10-2026, the material reviewed does not establish personal or institutional negligence or fraud. This is not proof that all records or factual issues have been resolved. The current record justifies document recovery because the archaeological intervention is an independent factual layer relevant to what remained on the site and what was known.

Human action

Obtain the original contract/brief, condition references, field records, report, finds register, archive deposit and correspondence with the planning authority/GGAT.

Acceptance: a source-complete archaeological intervention dossier with a clear authority and records chain.

Institutional appearance timeline — linked source index

Coverage rule: this is a chronological navigation map of published Wiki source pages found by searching the current site index for “Cotswold Archaeological Trust”. Every event label links directly to the page containing the source. It avoids duplicating source narratives. It records mention/appearance, not culpability. Dates are transcribed from page titles where available; “Date not explicit in title” means the linked source must be consulted. Search indexing is a discovery aid, not proof of exhaustive external coverage. ^🕒

Records-access register appearances — direct row links

Rows below match the institution’s name or an alias in the reply register’s sender/reference or recorded description. A match shows an appearance in the records trail, not necessarily an act by this institution.

No matching reply-register row was found for this name/alias set. That is not evidence that no correspondence exists; broaden the alias search when new records are added. ^🕒

Related navigation: FOI & Public-Authority Reply Register · Records Access Chronology · Evidence Library